Liberal Forum

Mrkelly » Yesterday, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:48 pm

  I ain’t talking about building a warehouse Cletus

of course they can be built quickly 

A MANUFACTURING facility is a whole different animal 

more like this

An ISOLATED example isn't the norm, DICKHEAD!!

You **** gloom and doomers need to be executed and incinerated. PERIOD!! Lefties ALWAYS want to delay, delay, delay and tell us "it can't be done". I remember your side telling everyone "It will take 10 years to drill for all that oil". In under 2 years, OIL WAS FLOWING in MASSIVE QUANTITIES!! During WW II, factories were not just converted but BUILT to produce weapons needed to win in under 6 months. Liberty SHIPS built in under a week. Aircraft carriers built in under a year. Atomic reactors and centrifuges built and producing in under a year. AMERICA and AMERICANS can and will do when you **** IDIOTS get out of the damn way!!

If you want to live in a nation where "CAN DO" is what happens, then SHUT THE **** UP AND GET THE HELL OUT OF OUR WAY!! PERIOD!!

Intel's chip manufacturing project in Ohio has experienced multiple delays, with the first plant in New Albany now projected to begin operations between 2030 and 2031, and the second plant in 2032. These delays are attributed to various factors, including market challenges, slower-than-expected rollout of government funding, and Intel's own financial struggles. 
Here's a more detailed breakdown:

• Initial Timeline:
  Intel originally planned to begin chip production in Ohio by late 2025. 
• First Delay:
  Construction on the first plant was initially expected to be completed in late 2026, but this was pushed back due to market challenges and the slow rollout of government funding. 
• Continued Delays:
  Further delays have been announced, with the first plant now projected to begin operations in 2030 or 2031. 
• Second Plant:
  Construction of the second plant is now expected to be completed in 2031, with operations beginning in 2032. 
• Reasons for Delays:
  Intel has cited a combination of factors, including market challenges, slow rollout of government funding through the CHIPS and Science Act, and Intel's own financial difficulties.