Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
40,606 posts
ROG62 » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
brown, it's based on the Cochrane review...
Medical journals say that Cochrane reviews
are“recognized worldwide as the highest standard in evidence-based healthcare,”
are the “best single source of highest-quality systematic reviews,” and
are “regarded as the final word in the medical debate on a topic.” One
adds, “The main reason is that Cochrane reviews follow a common and specific methodology to limit bias.” If only the same could be said about the public-health officials at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).Specifically, Cochrane found, “Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza-like illness (ILI)/COVID-19 like illness”—or “to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza/SARS-CoV-2”—“compared to not wearing masks.” Moreover, “The use of a N95/P2 respirators compared to medical/surgical masks probably makes little or no difference for the outcome . . . of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection.” Each of these claims was made with “moderate certainty,” the second highest of four certainty classifications. (“Moderate certainty” means that “the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect.”)
nod...
What did the study cited conclude, according to the main body of the article?