Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

Another slogan you can rebleat, but not an argument you can prosecute..

SS, DD.

In this particular instance it is not informed by a specific problem associated with literacy.

That makes it, in my opinion, purely propaganda 

Is this clear?

As a general matter, do I believe literacy is a requirement for driving a tractor trailer?

In the absence of credible evidence to the contrary, I don't. 

Acknowledge that my stand cannot possibly be less ambiguous.

Oh, ok.  So you don't care if a driver can read the sign that tells him the bridge is weight limited?  Or trucks not allowed in the left lane?  Or the upcoming overpass is less than 13' 6"?  Or the hills he is about to enter are grade 7?  And I have lots more.  But hey, your unambiguous stand is understanding reading english is not required.  

You did catch the part it is already the law, correct?