Today 11:59 am
I used this same line of reasoning when I argued with Cannon”balls”Pointer. I said something like:DeezerShoove » Today, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ Could be a shorter blackout.
Would that mean the fragile system is getting less fragile?
PS
If the planet is a finite element in the "population equation" (and it is), isn't it logical to curtail the cattle from eating and **** the place to its own detriment?
I liken the notion of an individual life being so precious to the printing press.
When literacy was scarce and books were hand-scribed, it was nearly sacrilegious to destroy a book.
Then printing presses churned out more and more stuff. Precious is longer what any book is.
When primitives roamed and hunter/gathered a subsistence life, each life was more "precious" to help maintain a population.
Now that is a long dead problem. Each life being oh, so precious is a quaint notion.
It isn't difficult to see some people not giving a **** about what amounts to paperback people crowding the library.
Yes, these high level ranking conspirators are malevolent, but there is some “logic” to their twisted scheme. That is, humanity must be managed like “farm animals” to prevent damage to the larger ecosystem.
I brought up the theoretical carrying capacity of the planet, which he denied and said it was much higher than I imagined it to be.
So you aren’t the first to arrive at that morbid conclusion
