Liberal Forum

RichClem » 23 Jul 2014 3:03 pm » wrote:
That is my final answer. You're a psychotic and a serial liar with no integrity.

So bleat all you want.

Hmmm... Interesting. So you never called the GM bailout socialist, huh? I went over yonder, Clemmie, and what did I find?

You certainly called the BANK bail-outs socialist...

Banks are doing well because of the Socialistic bailout, including the ongoing Fed low-rate policies.

And made some general charges of socialism...

Because Obama and Dems have Socialized large sectors of the US economy.

But wait... wait... what's this.... Can it be true? Did a poster call the auto bailout "socialist," and get agreement from the guy whose "final answer" was that he never took that position?

Finance.
Student loans.
And given the power of Obama's new consumer agency, arguably the entire retail sector will be Socialized eventually.
If Obama's not a Socialist, the word has no meaning.

Aww... RichClem caught in another lie - not exactly earth shattering, given how many he tells.

Let's see if he does it again, in response to charges that Obama's policies resemble socialism:

And that's what Democrats promote both in ideology and do politically right in front of liberals' unseeing eyes.
Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac, the IMF, Worldbank, Big Agriculture, Alternative Energy, bailouts of Chrysler and GM, etc. etc. were written into law by the liberal-left, who later bleat in outrage that Big Business has taken every institution over.
Of course it does.That's why advocates of Free Market Capitalism oppose such alliances, such institutions.

Gosh. His final answer looks like just another Glory Hole whopper.