Yesterday 9:00 am
Let's say it could have. What would Amazon's incentive be to provide that useless information? THAT would be partisan.Cedar » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Seems an AI algorithm could have handled all the funny math on inflation, if the desire was there.
All consumers care about is the bottom line, most can’t even comprehend how it got there.
Kicking about tariffs isn't partisan, when tariffs are an existential threat to your business model.
Again, I don't own Amazon stock, and I'm not a big booster. I'm just answering the question of the thread. Ascribing Amazon's tizzy to partisanship is partisan hackery at its finest.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?