Capitalism loses out to Socialism, per Heritage Foundation Post #6356 • Liberal Forum

RichClem » 23 Jul 2014 8:50 pm » wrote:

Oh, gosh! I had intended to cherry pick the most free market aspects to prove my case.

Dadgum it!

Yes, it is relative - and it is also fallible. You treat it like the word of god, and it is the word of man, dullard.

If I can take their "second free-est" and demonstrate, as I have, that citizens have very limited civil rights and are subject to corporal punishment in the public square for offenses as small as LITTERING; that they have a progressive tax scheme which redistributes the nation's wealth to the poor, the elderly and the "disadvantaged;" that the government owns upwards of 30% of the nations means of wealth production; that the nation has compulsory state education with FAR fewer and stricter waivers for home or religious schooling (presumably, only available to folks with serious connections); that they have cradle to grave government-run universal health care - if I can demonstrate and document all of that and more in short order, then one of two things is true, Glory Hole:

1.. Heritage is over-focused on low corporate taxes to the exclusion of all else, putting individual rights WAY behind tax breaks for the wealthy, or
2. Your political philosophy is so horribly and freakishly out of whack that your second best nation-friend on earth thinks you are an ignorant, backwards *** hole.

You choose - I'm cool either way.

When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?