31stArrival » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Be nice. I see your sarcasm and it also reflects what you generally think of me. I will give it the benefit of doubt.
No really.....And this post too. I mean, we don't need what the below would normally be. Actually, we don't ever need it.
Seems you might well be just another soc for Johnny You. But your social consensus and ancestral lineage hasn't accepted that, yet. That is your reality as defending a New World Order of imagined possibilities created societal evolution so far by rule of law typecasting ancestral lineages into legal stereotypical people that either comply to social consensus or not.