Yesterday 3:12 pm
Which AGAIN proves it was a religious war on our part.Vegas » Today, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ True. This is a case of process vs principle. It would certainly make it easier to and more efficient to suspend habeas corpus. However, sacrificing principle and justice on the basis of an easier process sets a dangerous precedent. There are still 20+ prisoners at Guantanamo Bay that have not received a fair trial in 20+ years. They are just sitting there. When they were captured, they could have been farmers minding their own business. The military used a very broad criteria of who they could identify as terrorists. Basically, if you were male at a certain age, and wore a rag on your head, then that was enough.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?