Today 4:57 pm
I never mentioned them. congress is protecting billionaires at the expense of non millionaires, the poorer one is the more affected they will be by tax cuts for the super wealthy.Cannonpointer » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I never denied there were repuke billionaires, child. You're in a different argument.
I was just surprised when you informed the board that Soros and Gates and Buffet and Turner and Hoffman and Hastings and Sandberg et al are repukes.
I am always delighted to learn new things from people who think before they speak pout.
non republicans getting tax cuts is not why congress is cutting taxes for the rich, it is for rich republicans who donate to republicans. billionaire democats might get tax breaks but that is not the objective.-----------------------------------///////////////////////////////////////
The richest 1 percent have more wealth than the bottom 95 percent of the world’s population put together, new Oxfam analysis of UBS data reveals today ahead of the annual UN High-Level General Debate.Billionaires are exerting new levels of control over economies, with a billionaire either running or the principal shareholder of more than a third of the world’s top 50 corporations. The combined market capitalization of these corporations is $13.3 trillion.-================//////
so 95 per cent of money will be taxed at lower rates, that would be billions of untaxed money that could have gone into the revenue. so when they cry the country is broke don't come running to me.