Yesterday 12:09 pm
it is put to the vote and not one democrat vote is needed to get it passed.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Are ya sure?
Which ones are the bad guys again? I've lost track, what with TPP, transpolitics, and the opening of our borders to third world brown people exclusively.
I guess when we started imprisoning women with men in violation of the Geneva Conventions and 80 years of international treaties to which we are signatory and which comprise settled international law, I just forgot how the democ rats were morally superior. But this bill your making reference to, I'm sure THAT element of the show will help me understand that the democ rats are - while not perfect, - the lesser evil.
I mean, **** women and kids - it's this particular bill that matters, even though it could never have passed without the democ rats' tacit support while pretending to resist. Which bill are we referring to, by the way? The OP doesn't mention any bills.
more about the bill.//////////////////////////////
The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" includes a provision that could significantly limit federal courts' authority to enforce contempt citations, particularly in cases involving the Trump administration. Specifically, the bill stipulates that courts cannot use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security bond was posted when the injunction was issued. This applies retroactively and prospectively, affecting orders issued prior to, on, or after the bill's enactment. Here's Erwin Chemerinsky in "Just Security" warning about it: