Yesterday 6:26 pm
If they had gone very peaceably and requested entrance that they had a legal right to request and been assaulted by law enforcement, THAT would be the context.*Beekeeper » Today, 5:22 am » wrote: ↑ You don't need "context" to charge a crime here. You only need the ACT, which is where the CRIME IS!!
Robbing a bank to take care of a sick child is context. The ACT OF ROBBING is the crime. One doesn't excuse the other.
Again, I highly doubt that happened. I'm pretty sure it was a chimp out and it's going to end in a ***-fisting.
I'm just telling you, there is NO EXCUSE for opening the tape right in the middle of the melee. It's suspicious. When you see seedy "journalism," you SHOULD have the sense to be suspicious.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?