jerrab » Today, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑
I take the firm stand that republicans fight for republicans even though a few rich democrats might benefit as well.
And I take the firmer stance (firmer because it's smarter) that there are no republicans and democrats at the level of the oligarchs. Just actors, playing roles, and each are members of the same brotherhood with the same interests working toward the same ends.
jerrab » Today, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑
and if mark zuckerford is counted among the democrats, let me say that the rules on facebook are changed. perhaps trump promised him reduction in his taxes.
I commiserate with you that the election of Trump threw a monkey wrench into the fascism and censorship that your party supports and relies on.
You can define woman - and bully for you.
But you cannot define hate speech, so you should STFU about it.
jerrab » Today, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑as Mark Zuckerberg seeks to curry favour with Donald Trump.////////// ------------------------------/////////
Zuckerberg also loosened moderation rules around offensive speech ...
Just notice that you are complaining about less censorship.
Do this BEFORE you shoot yourself, not after.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?