Yesterday 12:44 pm
Is this ^ for an imaginary audience, tard?Blackvegetable » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ When you feel compelled to declaim at an imaginary audience, you have lost the Argument.
By admitting that there is only male, female, and neuter - which you also wierdly insist on calling "non-binary," because you THINK it gives you wiggle room, - you are admitting that biology is still a hard science and that until FULL TRANSISTION (which I dispute is a thing), no man has a right to demand to play on women's sports teams or insist that the rest of us pretend he is female. You NEEDED fuzzy definitions, you stoop - and you seemed at some level to understand this, since you insisted on defining this imaginary "third gender" twice, to leave some wiggle room.
The problem is, if a person is "neuter," cutting off a neuter's **** doesn't change them from neuter. They're still a neuter. They didn't change their sex.
Care to take another swing?
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?