jerrab » Today, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑
once this hits the news people will be shocked.
https://www.abajournal.com/news/article ... insky-says
A budget bill by the U.S. House of Representatives contains a “stunning” provision that would limit federal courts’ ability to hold government officials and other litigants in contempt for disobeying their orders, according to law dean Erwin Chemerinsky. (Image from Shutterstock)
A budget bill by the U.S. House of Representatives contains a “stunning” provision that would limit federal courts’ ability to hold government officials and other litigants in contempt for disobeying their orders, according to Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean at the University of California at Berkeley School of Law.
"When judges exhibit consistent abusive behaviors which over-reach to control foreign policy against the democratic will of the electorate, it is incumbent upon the Legislature todecisively limit the power of the judiciary until such time as rebellious judges can be effectively censured." - what I just said.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?