Today 10:13 am
She did it. I'm sure of it. I would convict in 2 minutes. Could care less about what cops say or lied to. Here's what I know. Karen Read did not testify in her own defense during her first trial. Very doubtful she will testify in this one. Not to mention, all of the facts point to her killing her husband. ****, the husband or wife is always guilty in marital murder cases! She's guilty as hell.Cannonpointer » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You would not be saying that if you were on her jury. Those are words uttered in ignorance. Watching cops get caught in dozens of perjeries has a way of raising doubt.
Getting hit on the arm by an SUV doesn't send you corkscrewing thrity feet through the air without so much as a bruise or fracture. It just doesn't - you can google it. It doesn't put fist wounds on your orbital sockets and under your eyes, either - especially if you landed on your head, which would be necessary to explain the blunt force brain bleed.
"She was mad and he's dead" doesn't convict - sorry.
The investigators know way more than they will be allowed to say in court. Regardless, people who truly didn't commit the crime (0.01% of them) will testify in their own defense, unless they are retarded. What have you got to convince me otherwise?