Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:48 am

According to the Times, Kent pushed officials to edit the intelligence study about whether the administration could justify the deportation of Venezuelan migrants to a brutal prison in El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, a rarely used 18th-century wartime law, by linking the Tren de Aragua gang to the Venezuelan government....
The original analysis reportedly contradicted the Trump administration’s claim that the Tren de Aragua gang is controlled by the Venezuelan government and has been ordered to commit crimes inside the United States.

 To shield the administration from political blowback, Kent allegedly urged edits to the report.

 “We need to do some rewriting” and more analytic work “so this document is not used against the DNI or POTUS,” Kent wrote in an email on April 3 to a group of intelligence officials, the newspaper reported.

https://www.removepaywall.com/search?ur ... nst-trump/

People so **** stupid they must have been born to be grifted.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.
When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
or
"Sampling error"
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.