User avatar
Mrkelly
Today 12:22 pm
User avatar
      
9,343 posts
Cannonpointer » 46 minutes ago » wrote: I believe the white south africans.

It's not hard to find their stories.

Laws require white farmers to share the fruits of their labors with blacks, and laws prohibit whites from working at many jobs during daylight hours because they are "too white."

The complaint that whites at less than 5% of the population own70% of the farmland SOUNDS like a reasonable complaint - an unfair holdover from apartheid. But in truth, apartheid prevented zero blacks from farming, and a want of land today prevents zero blacks from farming. The devil is in the details - and the operative detail in this equation is that "farmland" is described as "land where farming occurs." So any land can be farmland - if someone is willing to do the work.

The blacs aren't willing to do the work. But they ARE willing to grumble that those who are willing to work have more than those who are not.

There is still apartheid in S.A. But the blacks run the system now.

Another game they play with numbers is the high murder rate affecting blacks more than whites. Whiteswork very hard to avoid blacks, so their murder rate is lower. But blacks are getting murdered for reasons other than their race. With whites, it's their race.

I have seen video of that president Trump accosted making jokes about white genocide. When asked if S.A. was killing off whites, he said, "No yet," and laughed.There's nothing I can do about that tape's sudden disappearance. 

Apartheid in S.A. lasted far less time than in the US.

I have been hearing white South Africans' horror stories for someyears, now. Like I say -Ibelieve the victims. Here's one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJT7hM4GxC0
I asked the google “what is the whitest area in S Africa “

The city that Musk is from … Pretoria 

then I went to their news site

they had an interesting take on the meeting 

Image  called them “those two ruthless musketeers”

“Trump did try to manage the dazzling and egregious conflict of interests playing out at the White House meeting on Wednesday where Starlink received some valuable, "free" airtime and brownie points while Musk looked on. His satellite internet service was promoted for use in SA to fight farm crime. I’d give Trump 1/100 for effort.

Trump can no longer ignore the growing complaints about such conflicts of interests that smack of state capture.Interestingly, the same Wiki also states that "State capture is not necessarily illegal, depending on determination by the captured state itself ..." Anyway, it was a hard, potentially dangerous and dirty job that Ramaphosa and Co had to do in Washington to save our small, open and potentially vulnerable economy.

He was damned if he did, and damned if he didn't go to curry favour with those two ruthless musketeers currently running the USA like their tuckshop. But it was painful watching and listening to some of the cringeworthy false claims, exaggerations and plain blue lies.”

https://iol.co.za/pretoria-news/opinion ... -to-do-it/ 

I don’t trust the white *** either 
 
 
 
Image
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum