Today 12:48 pm
None of that matters. It was a domestic dispute where she, in a fit of rage, killed her husband.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a blue line bunny, is my bet.
Here's the truth about one of your heroes, on whose word you would convict an innocent woman:
That bit about "sharing confidential information with non-law enforcement personnel" has to do with him helping to shield the actual perpetrators of the murder. The cop was beaten to death by other cops in the residence of a cop = and bitten and clawed by the cop's dog, which was then destroyed.
One of the cops received an order to preserve evidence - the evidence being his own cell phone. But he got the heads up, and the day before he was served, he went to a military base, and he broke his cell phone and put in in a bag and threw it in a dumpster. In that same bag he also placed the phone's sim card, which he had cut and mangled. Most of the exculpatory evidence the defense has found has come by way of subpoenaing the dirty cops' cell phones.