Liberal Forum

 

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm

*Huey » 03 Jun 2025, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2025, 12:07 pm

@Blackvegetable  

The link as promised

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... ult_weapon]


 

I never asked for it...

It's irrelevant..

 

*Huey » 03 Jun 2025, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2025, 12:26 pm

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm

*Huey » 03 Jun 2025, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2025, 12:07 pm

@Blackvegetable  

The link as promised

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... ult_weapon]

 In May 2012, the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence said that "the inclusion in the list of features that were purely cosmetic in nature created a loophole that allowed manufacturers to successfully circumvent the law by making minor modifications to the weapons they already produced."[22] The term was repeated in several stories after the 2012 Aurora, Colorado sh

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... c_features

I never asked for it...

It's irrelevant..

I didn't say you did.  But your education on this topic requires it and I said I would.

It is very relevant.  Your fear of these weapons is based on who is attracted to it by appearance.  So what happens when there is a ban, like in the 90s, manufactures build the same existing weapon without those features.  The weapon operates the same, is still mean and scary, and still attracts the same people you fear.

Here is your L.

There is nothing in that post saying I agree it is irrelevant, ya non reading ****.  Ivy League my ***.  And the reason it is relevant is because when I posted the what was actually banned in 1994 you said it was ****.  When I proved you were wrong you went all bat **** crazy liar on me.

Blackvegetable » 04 Jun 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2025, 12:08 pm

*Huey » 04 Jun 2025, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2025, 12:06 pm

And I showed you lie.  

My response before you changed this post:

Here is your OP.

Here is the only portions that are your own thoughts:

A SECOND CLASS RIGHT?????!!!!!!!????

DOGS AND CATS LIVING TOGETHER!

and:

And if you don't think it can get any uglier for the Sporting Rifle crowd....

None of that states a REAL position.  Please do so when ready.  This is where your theatrics and grandstanding **** you every time.

You're lying.

You were quoted verbatim.

None of that states a REAL position

Then post my real position.

Concerning your real position I have no clue at this point.  You are a revolving door of position.

Did you even read the post you just quoted?  Below is all you wrote:

That is all you wrote in the OP:

A SECOND CLASS RIGHT?????!!!!!!!????

DOGS AND CATS LIVING TOGETHER!

and:

And if you don't think it can get any uglier for the Sporting Rifle crowd....