Liberal Forum

MR-7 » Yesterday, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:53 am

That's EXACTLY what I'm sayin Skans. How does a responsible parent not know the welfare of their child? And....I am calling the little BASTARD a pedo, because he is no different than the child groomers and molesters on here. Are they not pedo's too? I mean, they are all for the kids being both mentally and physically abused. Boys can be girls, and girls can be boys.    LGBQT *** in kindergarten classes. Liberals support all of this and hanks is a *** liberal. I hope this helps explain my pedo comment.

Ok, Mr-7, I was inquiring because I thought perhaps I missed something in the Hanks story. I reserve "Pedo" for people who either molest children or have some weird sexual attraction to children. Then, there are pedo-enablers - people who know this is happening but allow it to take place. One is sick.  The other is weak. Then, there are people who do not fight for their children even when they know they are being abused by an X-Spouse.  This too is weak and/or lazy.

Like you, I expect people who are blessed enough to be ENTRUSTED by God with children, to do everything in their power to provide that child(ren) with parental love and the best life possible. I believe God gives us what he thinks we can handle, when it comes to entrusting us with the lives of others. If a woman is barren then perhaps it is her and her husband's calling to adopt and raise a child in need. When a parent abandons a child entrusted to him/her, I believe...I hope there will be a reckoning.