Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:33 pm

*Huey » Yesterday, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:31 pm

You did not say assault long guns.  

You are wrong.

 

 

*Huey » Yesterday, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:31 pm

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:21 pm

*Huey » 05 Jun 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jun 2025, 1:26 pm

In the title they define as an assault WEAPON.  I posted definitions for you earlier. It uses assault long gun once and  then the article claims Maryland owners brought forward a case that challenged the law in 2020, arguing that they have a Second Amendment right to own common assault rifles.  Assault Weapon  is used multiple times.

You're wrong.

The Maryland State Police is responsible for reaching its own conclusions with respect to whether particular firearms are copies of enumerated banned firearms. In reaching those conclusions, the Maryland State Police adheres to the process articulated in the Firearms Bulletin #10-2 dated November 4, 2010 a copy of which may be found on our website. To that end, the Maryland State Police has determined that, for enforcement purposes, a firearm is considered a copy if it is both cosmetically similar to and has completely interchangeable internal components necessary for the full operation and function of one of the enumerated banned weapons.

This list represents those determinations. It includes weapons that are: 

1. Firearms defined under State law as "assault long guns," including firearms specifically enumerated under § 5-101(r)(2) of the Public Safety Article and their copies. 
 
https://mdsp.maryland.gov/Organization/ ... earch.aspx

Now try answering the question,  honestly.


 

You did not say assault long guns.  You said assault long rifles.  I accept your admission you were wrong.  Read your title,

Never heard of an assault long gun.  Sounds like another made up term like Assault Weapon.