Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:37 pm

*Huey » Yesterday, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:34 pm

I am not 

YOU were wrong.

Now answer the question,  honestly.

 

*Huey » Yesterday, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:34 pm

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:33 pm

*Huey » Yesterday, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:31 pm

You did not say assault long guns.  

You are wrong.

 


 

I am not playing your editing post that **** your argument.  Go ahead and me to post your thread title, ******.  I dare ya.

*Huey » Yesterday, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:31 pm

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:21 pm

You're wrong.

The Maryland State Police is responsible for reaching its own conclusions with respect to whether particular firearms are copies of enumerated banned firearms. In reaching those conclusions, the Maryland State Police adheres to the process articulated in the Firearms Bulletin #10-2 dated November 4, 2010 a copy of which may be found on our website. To that end, the Maryland State Police has determined that, for enforcement purposes, a firearm is considered a copy if it is both cosmetically similar to and has completely interchangeable internal components necessary for the full operation and function of one of the enumerated banned weapons.

This list represents those determinations. It includes weapons that are: 

1. Firearms defined under State law as "assault long guns," including firearms specifically enumerated under § 5-101(r)(2) of the Public Safety Article and their copies. 
 
https://mdsp.maryland.gov/Organization/ ... earch.aspx

Now try answering the question,  honestly.



 

You did not say assault long guns.  You said assault long rifles.  I accept your admission you were wrong.  Read your title,

Never heard of an assault long gun.  Sounds like another made up term like Assault Weapon.