18 May 2022 10:57 am
Skans » 18 May 2022, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ Fair enough. I do, however, note that you do not refute the way I defined the two terms. But, that's possibly because you realize that would not further the discussion.
I agree to some extent. I think certain activities, like high school dances, proms, homecoming, may still have a place. Also, I think it would be impossible to scrub gender out of books. Also, dress codes tend to fall along gender lines. Making everything completely gender neutral would be a big mistake, but I do not believe that is what you are suggesting. I'm just pointing out that on some level this needs to be addressed rationally.
I completely agree. Personal politics have no place in schools at all.
Real History, now there's a baited phrase if there ever was one. In England, some schools still require that their students memorize the English Monarchs. So, what do you define as "Real History"? Also, how many semesters do you want dedicated to teaching history? Some folks pursue post-graduate degrees in history focusing on just American Slavery, or the Algonquin Indians, military tactics of Jefferson Davis, or the reign of King Henry VIII. Limited time.....limited young minds.....trying to keep things neutral, yet cover 1600's to 2022. That's a tall order, Chief.
...get to the point, dumb@ss!.... you won't be happy until your particular [stooooooooopid f@ck] iteration of 'conservative republicanism' controls government schooling... little do you know but you're just another authoritardian monetary ignoramus and dimwit with an
opinion...word... 