Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 14 Oct 2014 11:21 am » wrote:
Using your standard, we'd have fought WWII without a declaration of war, and our soldiers who were taken prisoner would rightly have been treated as common criminals who killed people NOT in a war zone - the fate of those who were captured in Vietnam.

They were abandoned. We had no legal argument on their behalf. No state of war existed, and yet there they were - just killing folks right and left (some of them were even soldiers), as if there were a state of war declared.

They never came home. They were never freed, They stayed in Vietnam for the rest of their lives, as criminals, not soldiers.

That is not my OPINION. That is what HAPPENED. And you are on here defending it - along with your mousepack leader.

What does it say about you girls and your alleged conservatism, that you defend a conflict in which our troops were abandoned by a retreating, defeated nation?

Wait - let me guess. Dan Rather lost the **** war - right?