Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,315 posts
LibDave » 26 May 2022, 11:35 pm » wrote: ↑
I've forgotten more about economics than you have ever known. I have studied economics at university and as a subject of intense interest for the last 35 years. But even if I had never read a single sentence about the science of economics, the fact remains, I was and am able to predict the future results of economic policy, while you are ALWAYS 100% wrong. If you had even a rudimentary understanding, you would think you would be able to predict outcomes at least SOME of the time. You are always 100% wrong because your confirmation bias coerces you to make predictions based on your political leanings and you are backing an ideology which is also 100% wrong.
the fact remains, I was and am able to predict the future results of economic policy, while you are ALWAYS 100% wrong.
Really?
Have you ever voted for a POTUS who bequeathed a smaller deficit to his successor than what he inherited?
If you had even a rudimentary understanding, you would think you would be able to predict outcomes at least SOME of the time.
Why I never cast a vote for either "the worst of the modern era" or "worse than Buchanan".
You?
You are always 100% wrong because your confirmation bias coerces you to make predictions based on your political leanings and you are backing an ideology which is also 100% wrong.
Let's see how that looks after you answer.
I've forgotten more about economics than you have ever known.
I sure am glad there's a way to determine that.