User avatar
Cannonpointer
20 Oct 2014 9:57 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,426 posts
RichClem » 20 Oct 2014 9:11 am » wrote:
I never called his payroll tax conservative, because it wasn't. Its effect on the economy was minimal because the change in rates was so low, and it de-funded Social Security. which is already approaching insolvency.

It was a bandaid on a bleeding wound.

Wrong again, psycho.
Sorry, jaggazz. Too late.

There's no arguing keynesian/not keynesian.

You had a duty to define it yesterday, not to study it all night long and pretend to understand it today, poseur.

But you can explain these lies, if you like:
RichClem » 19 Oct 2014 6:55 pm » wrote: I never claimed the "issue" was minor. His role on it was unquestionably minor.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search