Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑
It is a central tenet of 2nd Amendment Absurdism that firearms are the ultimate tool with which the citizen may temper a tyrannical government.
Given the technological asymmetry inherent in any such contest, we can't be talking about a Malheur National Wildlife Refuge Legion of a couple of hundred AR-15 toting yokels on a cannonball run to DC. It can only mean limited, and largely symbolic, acts of defiance.
Charlie Kirk was a MAGA proselityzer...MAGA isn't a coherent political or economic statement - it's a tantrum. As such it derives its popular legitimacy by triggering paranoia and hatred and stoking grievance.
Because it lacks readily identifiable foreign enemies, it has looked inward for the necessary bogeymen. Transgenders, Science, Immigrants, Liberals, Jews and legal professionals have all served the role. This has generated an abundance of aggrieved parties.
The problem arises whem MAGA is the Oppressive Government. For the Ammosexual reading of the 2nd Amendment to have any meaning they would have to stand with the shooter as a matter of Principle.
Another point....one of the first things a true oppressive and tyrannical government will do is attempt to restrict, if not outlaw, firearm ownership. 2 terms and nothing from Trump. Dems on the other hand? At the state level they o what they can to restrict and make firearm ownership tougher. At the federal level they are always yapping about wishing to highly restrict particular guns. It is Supreme Court Judges, appointed by what you cal tyrannical and oppressive government, that are overturning Dem state restrictions and upholding the 2nd amendment.
Reality does not match your weird fantasy. Rebel is correct. You are insane.