Liberal Forum

Vegas » 15 Sep 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 1:57 pm

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 11:14 am

Patriots Notebook: 'Next Man Up' Refrain Rings Again
Patriots players and coaches reflected on how the team will move on after an injury to David Andrews will reportedly cost him the rest of the season.

https://www.patriots.com/news/patriots- ... ings-again

Next Man Up: Donovan Ezeiruaku steps into the limelight

https://www.dallascowboys.com/news/next ... -limelight

Chargers Win But Lose Perryman: Next Man Up?

https://shows.acast.com/los-angeles-cha ... ext-man-up

Why Chiefs’ Carson Steele appears to be next man up after Isiah Pacheco injury

https://www.kansas.com/sports/nfl/kansa ... 89219.html

I appreciate that MAGAts are averting their eyes from the NFL - with all those uppity black quarterbacks and the kneeling....but this expression is quite common in pro sports...

It has nothing to do with an "assassination list". The only person declaring Ben Shapiro "the next man up" is Ben Shapiro. 

**** idiots.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.