Just acknowledge that you either can't or won't (because it will make my case).DeezerShoove » 16 Sep 2025, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ I was nice and indulged your stupid-question format already.
Now you're abusing my good nature...
Let's just say this: If a person has NO message, he'd be ignored 95% of the time as an annoyance.
If he has a message that effectively goes against your narrative, you hate and fight back.
You tell me: What was his message?