jerrab » 18 Sep 2025, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, the shoe is on the other foot. It is a Republican administration that is using the threat of regulatory investigations and sanctions against a pillar of the American media — ABC, which is owned by Disney — to silence speech it disdains.
The resulting corporate decision to suspend Jimmy Kimmel from late-night television runs squarely afoul of the First Amendment. The constitution doesn’t guarantee Kimmel a talk show, but it does guarantee that the government won’t quash his speech because of what he chooses to say. Kimmel now has a straightforward suit for damages and forward-looking relief that he can and should file — not just against ABC, but also against the government officials who were the driving force for his embarrassing public disciplining.
The basic facts of Kimmel’s suspension are straightforward. The late-night host has been accused of mischaracterizing the motives of the alleged assassin of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, suggesting he may have hailed from the political right. On Wednesday, the chair of the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr, appeared on Benny Johnson’s podcast and described Kimmel’s remarks as part of a “concerted effort to lie to the American people.” The FCC, he said, has “remedies that we can look at.” He added: “We can do this the easy way or the hard way …. These companies can find ways to change conduct and take action, frankly, on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”
Hello…This was started by media groups Nexstar and Sinclair who own a **** ton of ABC affiliates. They said they were not going to air Kimmel because after what he said they felt he did not represent the values of the communities they broadcast to. Then the advertisers were scared so ABC and Disney suspended him.
Tlkimg to you is like tlkimg to a **** brick wall.