19 Sep 2025 12:17 pm
Mrkelly » 19 Sep 2025, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑Like this?
1. Plaintiff WallBuilders sought to advertise on the side of WMATA Metrobuses to
promote its religious and educational mission, which is to inform the public about the role that the
Founders’ religious faith played in the creation of the nation and the drafting of the Constitution.
WMATA rejected the ads because they related to issues on which there are varying public
opinions. Though WMATA never identified the specific issue of public controversy that it
believed the proposed advertisements addressed, it is apparent that WallBuilders was prohibited
from advertising because its proposed ads sought to address issues of public importance from a
religious viewpoint. WallBuilders brings this action to remedy WMATA’s violation of its
constitutional rights.
https://www.aclu.org/documents/wallbuil ... -complaint
But wait.....there's more:
Win for WallBuilders:In May 2024, Judge Beryl A. Howell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia today ordered the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) to accept and run four advertisements that it had unconstitutionally rejected. The court ruled that WMATA’s ban on issue ads violates the First Amendment’s requirement that restrictions on speech be reasonable.
https://firstliberty.org/cases/wallbuilders/
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152