19 Sep 2025 12:51 pm
Mrkelly » 19 Sep 2025, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑Like this?
1. Plaintiff WallBuilders sought to advertise on the side of WMATA Metrobuses to
promote its religious and educational mission, which is to inform the public about the role that the
Founders’ religious faith played in the creation of the nation and the drafting of the Constitution.
WMATA rejected the ads because they related to issues on which there are varying public
opinions. Though WMATA never identified the specific issue of public controversy that it
believed the proposed advertisements addressed, it is apparent that WallBuilders was prohibited
from advertising because its proposed ads sought to address issues of public importance from a
religious viewpoint. WallBuilders brings this action to remedy WMATA’s violation of its
constitutional rights.
https://www.aclu.org/documents/wallbuil ... -complaint
It will be whatever the ACLU wants to print. The ACLU is simply not a good source for honest info. Sorry.