3 Dec 2014 4:18 am
Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2014 4:08 am » wrote: I know exactly how you feel. You just claimed that deregulating Wall Street would make juries more sympathetic to plaintiff's in tort cases involving deaths caused by their products.
Seeing this was a preposterous claim on its face and UTTERLY unsupported by either evidence or argumentation, I immediately axed you to back that **** up.
But you won't. You won't even try - because you can't, and you know it. It was just filler rhetoric. And the idea that you're comfortable tossing out grandiose claims as filler rhetoric speaks volumes, son. You've been called too many times for you to think that **** was likely to fly. So we're left to conclude that you neither feel any shame in being caught in preposterous bluffs, nor have any compunction about becoming known for a dishonest nature.
So, yeah. What you said. Like the rest of your empty claims, it will go unargued, unsupported, unproven. It was just another of your whoppers.
He still doesn't get it. He thinks it has something to do with juries..... 