Liberal Forum

With respect to BV's favorite pic of who he thinks is Trump in drag, he claimed that AI confirmed that was indeed Trump. 

One problem. BV edited the statement or fabricated it altogether.

Here was his lie that he claimed AI replied with: The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.


AI completely nuked him. Here is AI's reply about his claim:

My prompt: 

Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."

AI's reply:

AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.
It can only:

• describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
• note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
• or restate what sources claim without verifying them.

What it cannot do:

• verify who the person actually is,
• confirm that an attribution is correct,
• declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.

 “It cannot confirm identity.”
 That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit. 

This would be a good time for him to live stream his suicide for our enjoyment.