Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,961 posts
Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑
Already posted.
And ot verified the
ATTRIBUTUON of that
SPECIFIC photograph.
It did so using Metadata from the Getty Collection of which it is part - NOT FACIAL RECOGNITION.
So you want to do this with me, huh? Ok, I warned you that AI is my home. But suit yourself.
Using Getty metadata means the AI repeated an archive’s label; it didn’t verify the identity of the people in the photo, attribution and verification aren’t the same thing. idiot. It can repeat the same wrong ****. God man. If metadata equaled verification, misattributed historical photos wouldn’t exist, but they do, which is why attribution is always provisional. **** moron.
Knocked out again.
What else do you got?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...