Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:39 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm

Since I have stipulated on multiple occasions there are many makes, models and definitions of an assault weapon YOU need to do the following:



 

You need to answer the question asked.

 

 

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:19 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm

Sorry that glitch is back.  Not doing edited quotes.  And, if you wish to ask questions it will be done on a one for one basis.  Or, you will have make a point by case that I will tear apart without questions.  But, you are man enough.

My one question just tore apart your premise.


 
Since I have stipulated m


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:16 pm

It's the Queef Filter...it's as unyielding as math.

I don't want to read a bunch of crap, I just want the answer. 

 



 

Before we go any further in your upcoming defeat you must post what definition of an assault weapon you are using.  It varies from state to state.

You have been running from that since I asked in August. When you pretended to ignore me.


 

Since I have stipulated on multiple occasions there are many makes, models and definitions of an assault weapon YOU need to do the following:

1.  Post what definition of an assault weapon you are using.

2.  Post the years Colt Sport was standard issue to US Combat Units and what wars it was used in.

3.  Stipulate that you will answer questions on a one for one basis OR that you will make a case in a point by point manner which I will than rip to shreds.

Oh, and remember, I don't do partial or edited quotes.  Perhaps you can use 3 concise bullet bullet points.  That has always been your demand anyway.