Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑
Numbness, I gave you that citation. Now tell ne the following:
1. What is the name and model number of the weapon you are discussing?
2. What years was the weapon standard combat issue for the military?
3. Which of the two lists at the source of the citation (civilian or military) does the weapon appear on?
Once you HONESTLY answer those 3 very simply questions you will lose. Well, you already lost. Notice NO ONE has ever said you were right in all the years you have been spewing this ****?
Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑
That's another lie.
It is as irrelevant as your questions.
You are not an authority on anything. You are as stupid as you are dishonest.
1. I did give it to you. That is the one that has the military and civilian lists. Dude, you memory is **** awful. That is why it appears you lie so much. Everything you think you know on this topic came from me.
2. Waiting on the answers to those questions. You don't eve know what **** weapon you are talking about.
PS. This is usually where you see me cuss and YOU rant that I am melting down. Remember, old man, calculating.
I'm sorry little liar, you have questions to answer.
I gave you that source because I asked you to post the list the weapon was listed on.
But, since you can't name the weapon you can't answer that weapon.