Liberal Forum

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:24 am

You lie about that, too.

You are running from CITATIONS.

Numbness, I gave you that citation.  Now tell ne the following:

1.  What is the name and model number of the weapon you are discussing?

2.  What years was the weapon standard combat issue for the military?

3.  Which of the two lists at the source of the citation (civilian or military) does the weapon appear on?

Once you HONESTLY answer those 3 very simply questions you will lose.  Well, you already lost. Notice NO ONE has ever said you were right in all the years you have been spewing this ****?

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 10:11 am

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:49 am

I'm sorry little liar, you have questions to answer. 

I gave you that source because I asked you to post the list the weapon was listed on.

But, since you can't name the weapon you can't answer that weapon.

No...I don't. 

The minute you stop lying about the established facts, this is over.

You aren't free to gainsay citations. You are always free to challenge what they assert, but the bar is much higher than "Is too!" and "But my rheumy eyes...."