Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑
Numbness, I gave you that citation. Now tell ne the following:
1. What is the name and model number of the weapon you are discussing?
2. What years was the weapon standard combat issue for the military?
3. Which of the two lists at the source of the citation (civilian or military) does the weapon appear on?
Once you HONESTLY answer those 3 very simply questions you will lose. Well, you already lost. Notice NO ONE has ever said you were right in all the years you have been spewing this ****?
Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑
No, Tiny...
"Your" citation says you are an idiot.
"The design" is singular.
Until you acknowledge that fact, you're owed nothing.
And you've lost.
Again.
If you can not name the weapon, post the model number of post what list it is on this over. You are gonna Get the same truly every single **** time.
In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.
[24] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.
[25][
better source needed] As
designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_AR-1 ... tyle_rifle
That is a different internal design.
Now, answer the questions.