second strike Post #731117 • Liberal Forum

Re: second strike

jerra b · 2026-01-06T21:50:03+00:00

thank trump -------------------------------------------------- Expanded Work Mandate: Homeless individuals, along with others newly subject to the rules (such as adults aged 55-64 and veterans), must now work at least 80 hours per month, participate in qualifying education/training programs, or volunteer to maintain their eligibility for more than three months in a three-year period. Implementation Challenges: Public health experts note that meeting such requirements can be extremely challenging for those experiencing homelessness due to a lack of stable housing, transportation, and reliable addresses for correspondence, which could effectively exclude them from eligibility. Research suggests increasing work requirements often leads to people losing benefits due to administrative hurdles rather than increasing employment.

DeezerShoove » 06 Jan 2026, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑
06 Jan 2026, 3:34 pm
I believe you are a partisan hack (like most of the MSM).
The double standard of what is allowable, legal, ethical, moral, etc changes with the party in power.
This is evident when you call out Trump but never blink when a Clinton bombs 5 separate nations or an Obama vaporizes a civilian.

Partisan hackery begets double standards. You do it without guilt.
Expect it in return without all the moralizing.

thank trump
--------------------------------------------------

Expanded Work Mandate: Homeless individuals, along with others newly subject to the rules (such as adults aged 55-64 and veterans), must now work at least 80 hours per month, participate in qualifying education/training programs, or volunteer to maintain their eligibility for more than three months in a three-year period.
Implementation Challenges: Public health experts note that meeting such requirements can be extremely challenging for those experiencing homelessness due to a lack of stable housing, transportation, and reliable addresses for correspondence, which could effectively exclude them from eligibility. Research suggests increasing work requirements often leads to people losing benefits due to administrative hurdles rather than increasing employment.