Liberal Forum

Vegas » 06 Jan 2026, 10:41 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2026, 10:41 pm

Treating Greenland as a national security risk is another exaggeration. America is not under any threat by not having Greenland. It just gives us more geopolitical leverage in the Arctic region. Russia and China are not going to invade them for their ports and minerals. Denmark is already a NATO ally and our military base there, Thule, is very much operable. It is just another power move for corporations. Greenland is very mineral-rich. It has some of the largest undeveloped metal deposits in the world, all in one place. At the moment, China dominates global rare-Earth processing worldwide. Thus, they contract most of the rare-Earth metal supply for products related to AI, electronics, EVs, drones, and military capabilities. But it is controlled. They don't own the mines or control the supply. They have the most contracts for the supply, but they don't own them. They can be cut -off whenever NATO says so.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."