Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 10:51 am

The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.


 

Oh my God. I literally disproved this. How the **** do you not remember this:



My prompt: 

Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."

AI's reply:

AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.
It can only:

• describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
• note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
• or restate what sources claim without verifying them.

What it cannot do:

• verify who the person actually is,
• confirm that an attribution is correct,
• declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.

 “It cannot confirm identity.”
 That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit. 

This would be a good time for him to live stream his suicide for our enjoyment.