Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:39 pm

I have no idea......I don't go through your profile.


What is in your profile that gets your panties in a wad?

1.  Veghead:
         “Are these your words” or posting my threads 

My reply:
       Are these my words?I will not entertain your stalking by agreeing to approve of you creeping around in my profile to dig up posts.God you are so **** dense. STUPID! STUPID!         STUPID! 

2. Veghead:
              For your “The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source." 

My reply: 
             My prompt: Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external         verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."AI's reply:AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.It can only:

• describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
• note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
• or restate what sources claim without verifying them.

What it cannot do:

• verify who the person actually is,
• confirm that an attribution is correct,
• declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.

 “It cannot confirm identity.” That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit. And  Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!Prompt: Attribute this photograph to Donald Trump.Reply: I can’t confirm or verify the identity of a real person in a photograph.I can describe what’s visible: the image shows an older man with light skin and swept-back blond hair, wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a red tie, with a small U.S. flag pin on the lapel. He has a serious expression and is photographed indoors with a softly blurred background. At most, someone might say the person resembles Donald Trump, but confirming or attributing the photograph to him as an identity claim isn’t something I can do.   

3. For your demands/question 
Reply:
        **** your questions. You don't answer my questions, so I owe you nothing. ↓
↓Is your toothbrush REALLY clean?

 

4. For your usual lies about answering the survivorship Bias question 
Reply:
         The question is not asking for definitions.
         The question is not asking what the answer is not: it is asking what it is.


5. For you accusing me of what you are guilty of.
My reply: 
       projecting again


6. For your incessant copying of me:
My reply: 
       Copies me again. pile up that evidence.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...