RichClem » 14 Dec 2014 7:00 pm » wrote:
I didn't say that I agree either. I don't know if any convictions occurred because of McCarthy or not. Neither do you.
AAAAAHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
WHAT A
FRAUD!
RichClem » 14 Dec 2014 7:00 pm » wrote:You
dishonestly called me a fraud, when in fact McCarthy exposed [NO ONE, BUT ONLY ACCUSED] a large [FICTIONAL, ALLEGED, PRETENDO] Communist Underground, which was my [COMPLETE LACK OF A] point.
As usual,
you [i] lied.
Go f***
your[MY]self.
WE'RE WAITING FOR YOU TO NAME ONE SPY WHOSE CONVICTION FOR ESPIONAGE WAS A RESULT OF MCCARTHYISM, FRAUD.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?