Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 10:41 am

It proves nothing.


A week ago it was an Article of Faith which you insisted must be acknowledged. 

You claim the salient fact is "irrelevant"...

He wasn't supposed to be in front of it.

 

It proves that the first shot was from the FRONT of the car, whether he was supposed to be there or not.  

Nod.

PS.  She was supposed be out of the car.  ANd he wouldn't have been there at all.  You progs leave that part out as well.