User avatar
Huey
14 Jun 2022 7:56 am
User avatar
      
37,293 posts
Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑
Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑ No, they are not irrelevant. If you keep using strike thru you will remain ignorant.
They have absolutely nothing to do with the reason the AR15 was designed and developed. 

You should read the citation, "armorer".

You have no idea what an assault rifle is, or why.

 

We have already been over this.  You lost.  You refuse to specify which weapon you are discussing.  The Armalite Rifle 15 which became the Colt c601 and designated the M 16 was a weapon designed for the battlefield.  The ATF classifies it a class 3 NFA weapon as a machine gun.  You have the Certification Letter.  

The Colt SP1 AR 15 was specifically designed for civilians use and marketed as a hunting rifle.  You have one of the marketing ads.  It was no more dangerous than any other semi automatic weapon.  
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search