Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 8:54 am

 For you.....Here's why

This text is written at a Post-Graduate / Professional reading level. It is highly sophisticated, though it uses that sophistication to deliver a polemic (a strong verbal attack).

To understand this passage, a reader needs more than just a high vocabulary; they need a deep grasp of American constitutional law, Latin legal shorthand, and contemporary political slang.

Let's get real for a minute.....can't get more "totes not your jam"...

You failed.......Miserably

There's only ONE THING you need to understand Constitutional law, asshole- an interpretation of the actual definition of words during the era it was written, not some legal mumbo-jumbo that you deem to be sophisticated "Latin legal shorthand". You see, this is where your side, the LEFTISTS, fail miserably, and that being your vapid attempts to turn a sow's ear into a purse when there is no purse to be made. Being creative with EXISTING TEXTS doesn't make you "smart" or "educated", it makes you a **** IDIOT that people see through inside of 2 seconds.

Let that sink in for a minute, ASSHOLE and then ANSWER THE **** QUESTION- 

Was math invented or discovered??

TRY hard to put some sophisticated "Latin legal shorthand" to that SIMPLE QUESION so I can kick you *** again!!