Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 8:34 am

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 7:19 am

Good for Stoner.  As the record shows the SP1 as chambered for .223 and has only one fire selection.  Which is labeled Fire but is semi automatic.

You have the sources and pics.  What else you got?

Good for Stoner. 

Why are you yammering about SP1 and .223?


 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 8:54 am

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 8:42 am

But the AR 15 SP1 was not chambered for 556.  This is why Why Smelly Mincing Mendacious Midgets, And Like Cretins, Must Always Answer clarification Questions The 1st Time.

You simply refuse to clarify what weapon you were discussing.

What round did the uvalde shooter use?



 

 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 9:17 am

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 9:01 am

First, some facts.  We know now, in spite of your years of spewing ****, that SP1 is not an assault rifle.  As I said earlier, you issue is with the ammunition, not the firearm.  

Probably the 556.  He also had a some 223.

As a matter of FACT, what round did the Uvalde shooter use?
 

 

Has anyone ever witnessed this asshole actually debate without incessant questions or demands? 

All this mother **** does is ask questions. Nobody even knows what stand he takes on anything.


Watch this: 
1. His dementia will kick in and demand that I post the rule/stipulations.