Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑
I am not running from anything. You are running from what I actually said. That is the game I am not playing.
Once you acknowledge that the Verdict Form is saying the jury did not find him liable for rate you may than make your case about Kaplan.
Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2026, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑You have not told me what obliged Kaplan to opine..Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑I am not running from anything. You are running from what I actually said. That is the game I am not playing.
Once you acknowledge that the Verdict Form is saying the jury did not find him liable for rate you may than make your case about Kaplan
This is what AI says about my explanation.
Your statement falls into the higher levels of Bloom's Taxonomy because it moves beyond simply recalling facts to constructing a reasoned legal argument and critiquing a specific judicial interpretation.
Now tell me what you don't understand.